The impact of digital disruption on social inequality: Challenges and opportunities for social work practice

Authors

  • Joy Anwuri Osian-Gabrie

Keywords:

Digital disruption; Social inequality; Digital divide; Social work; Digital literacy.

Abstract

Digital disruption, characterized by the rapid integration of digital technologies across industries, has significantly impacted social inequality. While technological advancements offer opportunities for economic growth and innovation, they also exacerbate social inequalities, particularly for marginalized populations. This paper explores the challenges posed by digital disruption on social inequality, such as the digital divide, exclusion from digital services, and labor market displacement. It highlights the role of social workers in mitigating these challenges by advocating for digital literacy programs, promoting equitable digital policies, and adopting innovative service delivery models. Case studies demonstrate how digital tools have both hindered and helped reduce inequality, emphasizing the importance of strategic interventions. The paper concludes with recommendations for social work practice and policy, stressing the need for collaboration between social workers, policymakers, and tech companies to ensure inclusive digital practices. By addressing digital inequality through these approaches, social workers can play a critical role in ensuring that marginalized groups are not left behind in the digital age. The future of social work lies in leveraging technology to promote social justice and equitable access to resources, fostering inclusive digital environments that support vulnerable populations.

References

Autor, D. H. (2015). Why are there still so many jobs? The history and future of workplace automation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29(3), 3-30.

Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2014). The second machine age: Work, progress, and prosperity in a time of brilliant technologies. W.W. Norton & Company.

Bujnowska-Fedak, M. M., & Grata-Borkowska, U. (2015). Use of telemedicine-based care for the aging and elderly: Promises and pitfalls. Smart Homecare Technology and TeleHealth, 3, 91–105.

Chan, C., & Holosko, M. J. (2016). The utilization of social media for health and mental health services. Social Work in Health Care, 55(9), 751–770.

Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Harvard Business Review Press.

Cureton, A., & Curtis, S. (2020). Digital literacy: A lifeline for marginalized communities. Journal of Digital Learning, 5(2), 50–63.

Dastin, J. (2018). Artificial intelligence is hiring. The New York Times.

Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin's Press.

Federal Communications Commission (FCC). (2020). 2020 broadband deployment report.

Helsper, E. J., & Reisdorf, B. C. (2017). The emergence of a digital underclass: Digital inequalities in post-industrial countries. Sociology Compass, 11(12), e12540.

International Telecommunication Union (ITU). (2019). Measuring digital development: Facts and figures 2019.

Kleinberg, J., Ludwig, J., Mullainathan, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2018). Prediction policy problems. American Economic Review, 108(3), 475–509.

McKinsey Global Institute. (2017). Jobs lost, jobs gained: Workforce transitions in a time of automation.

Noble, S. U. (2018). Algorithms of oppression: How search engines reinforce racism. NYU Press.

Norris, T. (2021). Telehealth adoption amid COVID-19: The next frontier for health equity? Journal of Health Disparities Research and Practice, 14(1), 12-15.

O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Crown Publishing Group.

Park, S., & Johnston, J. (2020). Digital literacy and social inclusion: Lessons from an evaluation of a digital inclusion project. The Journal of Community Informatics, 16(1), 1-9.

Perron, B. E., Taylor, H. O., Glass, J. E., & Margerum-Leys, J. (2010). Information and communication technologies in social work. Advances in Social Work, 11(1), 67-81.

Pew Research Center. (2021). Internet access and the digital divide. Pew Research Center.

Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., & Stern, M. J. (2020). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 768-780.

Schwartz, H. A., & Golder, S. A. (2022). The ethics of AI in social media. Journal of Social Media Studies.

Standing, G. (2016). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.

Suri, T., & Jack, W. (2016). The long-run poverty and gender impacts of mobile money. Science, 354(6317), 1288–1292.

Van Deursen, A. J., & Van Dijk, J. A. (2014). The digital divide shifts to differences in usage. New Media & Society, 16(3), 507–526.

Van Dijk, J. (2020). The digital divide. In The Oxford handbook of digital technology and society (pp. 329-346).

Van Lancker, W., & Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. The Lancet Public Health, 5(5), e243-e244.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-14

How to Cite

Osian-Gabrie, J. A. (2024). The impact of digital disruption on social inequality: Challenges and opportunities for social work practice. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (Oman Chapter), 11(2), 45–49. Retrieved from https://j.arabianjbmr.com/index.php/ocAJBMR/article/view/1242