Post-Publication Discussions Policy

The International Journal of Accounting Research (IJAR) encourages ongoing scholarly dialogue and constructive feedback following publication. We recognise that post-publication discussions are vital for advancing knowledge in accounting and related disciplines, fostering collaboration, and addressing any questions or concerns regarding published research. IJAR provides several structured avenues for such discussions while upholding academic integrity and professionalism.

Letters to the Editor

  • IJAR invites readers, researchers, and practitioners to submit Letters to the Editor in response to published articles. These letters may address interpretations, methodologies, results, or broader implications of the work.
  • Letters are reviewed by the editorial team and, if deemed relevant, may be published alongside the original article or in a dedicated section of the journal.
  • Authors of the original articles will have the opportunity to respond to letters, ensuring a balanced and transparent exchange of ideas.

Commentaries and Author Replies

  • Authors of published articles may submit Commentaries or Replies to clarify findings, provide additional insights, or respond to questions and critiques raised in letters or other communications.
  • Commentaries may also be invited by the editorial board to provide expert perspectives or discuss the broader context of a published study.
  • All commentaries and replies undergo editorial review to ensure clarity, relevance, and scholarly rigor.

Post-Publication Peer Review

  • IJAR supports post-publication peer review, allowing the research community to provide constructive feedback, critiques, or comments on published work.
  • Substantial concerns regarding the validity, accuracy, or ethical integrity of a study will be evaluated by the editorial board. Where appropriate, the article may be updated, corrected, or retracted in accordance with COPE guidelines.

Discussion on Online Platforms and Social Media

  • Authors are encouraged to engage in scholarly discussions on social media, professional forums, or other platforms regarding their research.
  • While IJAR does not directly moderate these discussions, any content that violates professional conduct, spreads misinformation, or constitutes personal attacks may prompt the journal to take action, consistent with its code of conduct.

Corrections, Retractions, and Updates

  • If post-publication discussions highlight errors, misinterpretations, or ethical issues, IJAR will take appropriate corrective measures, including issuing an Erratum, Corrigendum, or Retraction as per COPE guidelines.
  • Authors are encouraged to provide clarifications and engage proactively to maintain the integrity of the scientific record.

Engagement with the Editorial Board

  • Matters that cannot be resolved through letters, commentaries, or other standard communication channels may be escalated to the Editorial Board for further assessment.
  • The Editorial Board ensures that serious concerns related to research validity, ethics, or integrity are addressed promptly and transparently.

Academic Collaboration and Dialogue

  • Post-publication discussions may foster new research questions, collaborations, and further investigations into relevant accounting topics.
  • IJAR supports and promotes such constructive academic engagement to advance the field and enhance the impact of published research.